More Diebold mishaps?

Is it possible that Diebold is just really really bad at programming their voting machines? Or is there really some sinister motive behind their constant flubbing of the vote?

As reported by Citizens for Legitimate Government, it is quite possible that a Diebold voting machine error, either accidentaly or on purpose, may have stolen the New Hampshire primary from Barack Obama. Check the previous link for an exact tally of the inconsistencies.

Whether it was a malicious attempt to steal votes or just a simple programming error, why in the hell are we still using Diebold’s products? They have consistently proven their products to be sub-standard, especially for the purposes of accrately counting votes. Turns out they’re great at undermining the democratic process though, so maybe that’s why they still have a job.